Skip to content Menu
Clarionlegalcosts.com

Clarionlegalcosts.com

Sidebar
  • About
  • Blog
  • Costs Management
  • Court of Protection Costs
  • Litigation Costs
  • Events
  • Key contacts

Tag: Matthew Rose

Posted on July 10, 2019October 12, 2020

INTEREST IS NOT PAYABLE ON AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT AWARDED UNDER CPR 36.17(4)(d)

Where the Court awards an “additional amount” under CPR 36.17(4)(d) as a claimant / receiving party beating its own Part 36 offer, the additional amount will not attract “enhanced” interest under CPR 36.17(4)(a).

Continue Reading
Posted on March 5, 2019October 12, 2020

Consequences of beating a Part 36 offer may be varied by the Court

***THIS JUDGMENT HAS NOW BEEN SUPERSEDED*** Senior Courts Costs Office extends the principle in JLE v Warrington & Hamilton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] EWHC B18 (Costs). In JLE  Master…

Continue Reading
Posted on January 4, 2019October 12, 2020

The effect of Payments on Account on Part 36 and Judgment

The case of Gamal -v- Synergy Lifestyle [2018] EWCA Civ 210 has reinforced the position that a payment on account does not “increase” the value of a paying party’s Part 36 offer…

Continue Reading
Posted on November 1, 2018November 1, 2018

Clarion Costs Legal Updates

We have incorporated a collection of our blogs into a Blog booklet. The blogs were current at the date of publication, however these may have now been superseded. Please visit…

Continue Reading
Posted on September 29, 2016October 12, 2020

Part 36 in Personal Injury Claims

Practitioners in RTA or EL/PL cases take note! Settlement by Part 36 can have unexpected consequences, and defendants must seriously consider whether making a Part 36 offer is appropriate if they wish to dispute the costs claimed.

Continue Reading
Posted on July 29, 2016September 3, 2018

Clarion costs and litigation funding Newsletter July 2016

For up to date costs information please read Clarion’s July 2016 newsletter here

Continue Reading
Posted on June 24, 2016October 12, 2020

Qualified One Way Costs Shifting and CPR 36

Following the introduction of Qualified One Way Costs Shifting (QOCS), parties have begun seeking to find ways to try to recover their costs where they are not, on the face…

Continue Reading
Posted on June 17, 2016December 8, 2020

PROPORTIONALITY CONTINUES TO GET TOUGHER

The case of May & May -v- Wavell Group & Dr Bizarri [2016] is a another case which demonstrates the power of CPR 44.3(2) – ‘the Jackson test of proportionality’. …

Continue Reading

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Next Page

Follow Us

  • Twitter

Terms and conditions

Click here to view our terms and conditions.

Powered by WordPress.com.
Top

Blog categories

  • Costs Management
  • Court of Protection
  • Litigation Costs

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Contact Information

Elizabeth House
13-19 Queen Street
Leeds
LS1 2TW
T: 0113 246 0622

Terms and conditions